Measuring it · · By Gerald De Oleo
AI Visibility Tools for B2B SaaS: What They Don't Measure
Last updated
The short answer: buy one, but buy it as monitoring rather than diagnosis. The sticker price matters less than what the money meters — prompts, engines, seats or credits — and entry tiers frequently cover a single engine, which is close to useless for B2B.
Two things to declare. I sell services, not software, so I have a reason to frame tools as insufficient. And most comparisons of these tools are published by the tools themselves — worth knowing before you trust anyone’s verdict, including mine.
Run the prompt math first
Every tool meters differently, and this is where teams buy the wrong tier.
A serious B2B question set is 25–30 buyer questions with real constraints attached — CRM, team size, sales cycle, compliance. Across four engines that’s 100–120 prompt-engine combinations.
An entry plan quoting “15 prompts” usually means 15 total, not 15 per engine. Do that arithmetic before you compare prices, because it eliminates half the options immediately.
Watch the engine gating
Entry tiers commonly restrict which engines you can track. Some popular starter plans cover ChatGPT only.
That matters more than it sounds, because the engines disagree with each other. They pull from different sources and return different shortlists for the same question. A tool tracking one engine gives you a quarter of the picture and no way to know whether a change helped or hurt everywhere else.
If budget forces a single engine, pick ChatGPT on volume — but treat it as a sample, not a measurement, and don’t build a site-wide strategy on it.
A free alternative while you decide: run 20 questions by hand across three engines once a month. It’s about an hour, it’s real data, and it tells you whether the category deserves a budget line at all.
The tools, by entry price
| Tool | Entry price | What the entry plan measures | What it doesn’t | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Otterly.AI (Lite) | $29/mo | 15 prompts, daily, on ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity and Microsoft Copilot | Gemini and Google AI Mode are paid add-ons | otterly.ai/pricing |
| Peec AI (Starter) | $95/mo | 50 prompts on 3 models you pick from ChatGPT, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Copilot, Gemini and Naver AI | Perplexity isn’t one of the Starter choices; every extra model is an add-on | peec.ai/pricing |
| Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit | $99/mo per domain | 25 tracked prompts for one domain, on ChatGPT and Google AI Mode per Semrush’s documentation | Each extra domain or teammate is another $99/mo; Perplexity and Gemini aren’t in the documented coverage | semrush.com/kb/1493 |
| Ahrefs Brand Radar | from $199/mo | Your brand across Ahrefs’ database of 538M+ AI prompts | Tracking your own prompts is a separate package, from $50/mo | ahrefs.com/pricing |
| Scrunch (Core) | $250/mo | 125 prompts on ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and Copilot | Gemini, Claude and Google AI Mode are Enterprise-only | scrunch.com/pricing |
Prices checked November 2026 on each vendor’s own pricing page. Monthly billing; most are cheaper billed annually.
All five tell you whether you appear. None of them tells you whether the description is right, or why a competitor was picked instead — that gap is covered in “What none of them do well,” below.
Report-only versus tools that act
The clearest dividing line, and it should match your team.
Some tools track and chart; your team designs and executes every fix. Others add on-page audits and recommendations. A few generate content or take action directly.
A report-only tool inside a company with no capacity to act produces a monthly chart nobody uses. An action layer bolted onto a team that already has strong content and web capability is paying twice for the same function.
Ask where the prompts come from
Some tools track synthetic queries rather than questions real buyers ask. You get a healthy-looking number for questions nobody types.
This matters more in B2B than consumer. Your buyer’s questions carry their stack, their team size and their compliance requirements — and those constraints are exactly where a specialist can beat an incumbent. A generic question set will never surface that.
In the demo, ask: where do the tracked prompts come from, can I write my own, and is there a limit on how specific they can be?
What none of them do well
Three gaps come up in nearly every audit where the company already owns a tool.
Description accuracy. Most report sentiment, which measures tone. Accuracy is a different question: is the category right, is the product right, is the buyer right? A model can recommend you warmly for something you don’t sell and it scores as positive.
Entity conflicts. When your site says one thing and your directory profiles and old roundups say another, no dashboard tells you that’s why you’re missing. You see a flat line.
The order of work. Tools rank opportunities independently. They won’t tell you that publishing more content on top of an inconsistent identity amplifies the confusion rather than fixing it.
That’s the line between monitoring and diagnosis, which I go through in What Is an AI Visibility Audit.
Choosing by situation
Never measured this before. Start at the cheapest tier or a free one. Establish a baseline before asking for budget. Don’t buy an enterprise platform to answer a question you haven’t framed.
Small team, 1–3 marketers. Prioritize prompt allowance and engine coverage over features you won’t use. Report-only is fine if you can act on findings; otherwise look for audits with fix lists.
Mid-market with a content function. Multi-engine coverage starts paying for itself here. Unlimited seats matter if several people need access.
Enterprise or heavy procurement. SOC 2, SSO and data provenance narrow the field fast, and the tools built for it price accordingly.
Already on an SEO suite. The add-ons are shallower but bundled, and the adoption advantage is real if your team lives in that tool.
Validate whatever you buy
Don’t take any dashboard on faith, including a good one.
Cross-check it three ways: GA4 for sessions referred from AI engines (the setup is here), Search Console for AI Overview impression data, and manual spot checks — run the same prompts yourself and compare against what the tool reported.
If the tool and the manual check disagree, find out why before building a strategy on the tool’s number. Same advice I’d give about any measurement layer, mine included.
Quick answers
What does an AI visibility tool do? Runs a set of prompts across AI engines on a schedule and reports how often your brand is mentioned, how you compare to competitors, and which sources get cited.
How much do they cost? Entry tiers start around $29/month and run to several hundred, with enterprise contracts above that. What the price meters matters more than the figure.
Which one is best for B2B SaaS? There isn’t a single answer, and be sceptical of anyone giving one — most comparisons are published by the tools. Match prompt allowance, engine coverage and whether the tool acts or only reports to your team’s actual capacity.
Will a tool tell me why AI isn’t recommending me? Generally no. Tools report what’s happening. Most don’t diagnose cause, and many don’t track whether you’re described accurately at all.
Do I need a tool and a specialist? Not necessarily. If your positioning is clean and your team can act on findings, a tool may be enough. If you’ve repositioned, run multiple domains, or can’t explain your own numbers, the missing piece is diagnosis.
If you’ve got a tool and the numbers don’t explain themselves, that’s the gap I work in, and it’s what the audit explains. Before we talk, I run a free Shortlist Check — three or four of your buyers’ questions in one engine — so the call starts with something concrete. See how the audit works, or book a call.